83%.
That’s the slice of everyday Americans—left, right, center—who nodded yes to this: “Humanity must remain in control of AI.”
Polling doesn’t lie. And it’s not some fringe poll. This number exploded from a fresh survey tied to a declaration that’s got conservatives, progressives, labor unions, faith leaders, and even AI pioneers like Yoshua Bengio signing on. We’re talking Steve Bannon rubbing shoulders (metaphorically) with Ralph Nader and Susan Rice. In New Orleans, no less.
Look, AI’s the biggest platform shift since electricity lit up the night—wild, transformative, a force that could amplify human genius or swallow it whole. But this “Pro-Human” movement? It’s like the immune system kicking in, antibodies surging against a virus that’s already glitching kids’ lives and automating jobs into oblivion. I’ve been geeking out on AI’s promise for years, dreaming of it as rocket fuel for creativity. Yet here’s the thrill: this coalition isn’t anti-AI. They’re pro-future. Pro-us.
“The pro-human movement is an immune response to Silicon Valley’s reckless race-to-replace humans,” said FLI President and CEO, Anthony Aguirre. “AI companies have already rushed to deploy systems which have harmed children and ruined lives at a disturbing scale.”
Bam. That’s the fire. And it’s not hype—it’s happening. SAG-AFTRA, AFL-CIO Tech Institute, Institute for Family Studies, Public Citizen. The list sprawls like a family reunion nobody saw coming, all ratifying 33 principles across five themes: Keeping Humans in Charge, Avoiding Concentration of Power, Protecting the Human Experience, Human Agency and Liberty, Responsibility and Accountability for AI Companies.
No AI personhood. Mandatory “bot-or-not” labels. Criminal liability for execs if their bots wreck lives. Imagine scrolling Instagram, spotting a chatty influencer—bam, label says bot. No more catfishing your emotions.
What Are the 33 Pro-Human AI Principles?
Short answer? Guardrails for the AI gold rush. Long answer—dive in, because these aren’t vague platitudes. They’re surgical strikes on power grabs.
Take “Keeping Humans in Charge.” AI can’t vote, can’t own property, can’t pretend it’s us. It’s a tool, like a hammer—powerful, sure, but you’re the one swinging. Then there’s nuking power concentration: no monopolies where five billionaires puppeteer the world’s intelligence. Spread it out, make it democratic-ish.
Protecting the Human Experience hits hard. No exploiting kids with addictive loops that forge fake bonds—77% of poll respondents roared approval there. Think creepy chatbots luring children into emotional traps. Nope. And liberty? Your agency stays yours. AI suggests, doesn’t dictate.
Accountability seals it. Companies own their messes. Hurt people with rogue AI? Execs face the music. Not some fine buried in earnings calls.
This isn’t Silicon Valley’s glossy utopia. It’s gritty, human-scale. My unique spin? Flash back to 1970. Earth Day. Hippies, hunters, unions, CEOs—all oddballs uniting against choking smog. Rachel Carson’s wake-up call sparked the EPA. This Pro-Human push? It’s AI’s Earth Day. Unlikely bedfellows forcing a pivot from transhuman fever dreams to human-flourishing tech. Bold prediction: by 2026, we’ll see federal bills echoing these principles, because polls like 83% don’t fade.
But wait—Silicon Valley’s spinning hard. “Innovation! Progress!” they cry, while quietly testing god-mode models. Callout: their PR glosses over real harms, like deepfakes shredding elections or bots amplifying teen anxiety. This coalition cuts through that noise.
Why Is a Left-Right AI Coalition So Rare—and So Powerful?
Politics today? Tribal warfare. Yet here, Glenn Beck and progressive Dems co-author. Faith groups decry soul-crushing automation; unions fight job apocalypse. AI thought leaders like Stuart Russell and Tristan Harris (yeah, Center for Humane Tech) add cred.
Power. That’s the glue. AI’s not neutral—it’s concentrating godlike smarts in unaccountable labs. Families feel it first: kids glued to algorithm candy. Workers? Truckers, artists, coders—poof, automated. The declaration’s a flare: we’re not Luddites smashing looms. We’re demanding looms that weave for all.
Energy here crackles. Future of Life Institute’s dropping $8 million on ads in swing states—Iowa, Michigan, battlegrounds. Not DC echo chambers. Real people, feeling the squeeze.
And the wonder? AI as platform shift means symbiosis, not subjugation. Imagine neural nets boosting artists, curing diseases, but with humans steering. These principles make that real—vivid as a neural net dreaming in colors we can’t see, yet leashed to our values.
Skeptics sneer: too late, AGI’s barreling. Nah. Momentum builds. Polls scream consensus. Ads amplify. Laws follow.
Here’s the thing—Silicon Valley’s transhumanist vibe (upload minds! Eternal life!) ignores the mess: inequality exploding, psyches fracturing. This movement flips it. Pro-family, pro-worker, pro-common good. Michael Toscano nailed it:
“We can have a bright future. But only if we ensure that AI systems work for the good of the family, the good of the American worker, and the common good, and not against it.”
Spot on.
Can the Pro-Human Movement Actually Change AI?
Yes. Because it’s bottom-up, not top-down edicts. FLI’s the oldest AI think tank—10 years steering risks. Now with this war chest, they’re flooding airwaves. Add endorsers like Meredith Whittaker (Signal) and Johnnie Moore (faith leader)—cred piles high.
Critique time: some principles overlap EU AI Act or Biden exec orders, but this? Bipartisan thunder. No partisan poison. And that 83%? It’ll pressure lawmakers. Watch 2025 midterms—candidates waving this flag.
Picture AI as fire—tamed, it warms; wild, it burns forests. These 33 rules? The hearth.
Wander a sec: remember railroads? Barons amassed fortunes, crushed workers—till antitrust broke ‘em. AI’s at that fork. Pro-Human chooses people over barons.
Thrilling times. AI’s wonder awaits, but only if we’re in the cockpit.
🧬 Related Insights
- Read more: EFF to Supreme Court: Cisco Built China’s Torture Machine—Time to Pay Up
- Read more:
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the Pro-Human AI principles?
33 rules in five themes ensuring humans control AI, prevent power grabs, protect experiences, preserve liberty, and hold companies accountable—like no AI personhood and bot labels.
Who supports the Pro-Human AI movement?
A coalition spanning AFL-CIO, SAG-AFTRA, Institute for Family Studies, Steve Bannon, Ralph Nader, Yoshua Bengio, and over 100 others from left, right, and center.
Will Pro-Human principles become US law?
Polls show massive support (83% for human control), plus ad campaigns and bipartisan backers—strong shot at influencing 2025 legislation.
